Yes, there it obviously means “no parking”. You were complaing about the little bits between the parking spots. Right?

I don’t see the problem. Don’t park outside the marked area. Red line is reminding you, because lots of people think the marked rectangle is a suggestion.

Doesn’t that just mean “stay within the lines”? Which you probably must do anyway, so it’s just a reminder?

Det lyder som om du giver samme begrænsninger som mig, af samme årsager. 👍😄

Ja, jeg synes at stå uden for fællesskabet kan være et større problem, end at bruge de apps fællesskabet bruger. Jeg aner ikke hvordan det foregår i dit tilfælde, men her valgte jeg at give mig.

Jeg er enig i at en anbefaling er ligegyldig. Næsten alle de her apps må ikke bruges af børn under 13 alligevel.

You still can’t blame the word.

You lost me at “bailiff”. You are overthinking the analogy.

I see why you want to avoid the word at YOUR workplace. But the problem is your workplace, not the word.

forældre kan jo allerede begrænse adgang til forskellige sociale medier

Der er MANGE forældre (inkl mig) som gerne vil begrænse børnenes brug af visse sociale medier, men ikke gør det fordi det er der deres venner er.

I mine børn startede i de yngre klasser, var der bred enighed blandt forældrene at det var liiige tidligt nok. Men vi opnåede ikke enighed om at begrænse det, og det endte med at flertallet søvar forældre der stod alene.

Derfor er der er stigende antal forældre som efterspørger regulering på et højere niveau.

I like to call it “debt”, because it’s a problem that grows while you ignore it. Worst case, it becomes easier to start over than fixing it. But getting 100% rid of it isn’t good business either.

Like all other analogies, don’t overthink it. I don’t now what “involuntary liquidation” would mean for tech debt. Unless you mean the product won’t run for a significant amount of time due to overwhelming tech debt, which can absolutely happen.

Bare for at visualisere det, så prøvede jeg at forestille mig 36 mælkekartoner i vores køleskab til 4 personer.

Men så kom jeg i tanker om at når jeg handler stort ind (mad til flere dage), så kan jeg have lidt svært ved at at få plads til 3 liter mælk.

True, I didn’t think that far back.

Who does? What kind of objects?

“Share economy” seems bigger than ever to me. Just a few years ago it wasn’t even a thing.

This is such an odd post. So many details that are highly debatable, not many important details.

For example, is the egg refrigerated or room temperature? That changes the timing a lot. Talking about accurate timing is pointless without at least some idea of the initial temperature.

I don’t use a ice bath, or any kind of cooling down for hardboiled eggs. I don’t really have a problem peeling them, unless they are very fresh.

I own my data. I own my installation. That’s what I care about.

Why would I want to own the hardware, when it’s in an inaccessible building far away.

Lithium-* batteries don’t actually have any specific useful numbers. It’s something like this (the actual numbers are pulled out of my ass and depends on battery time and test parameters and even then I’m simplifying):

• At 0 volts, the battery is dead.

• At 1 volts, the battery is practically dead.

• Discharging to 2 volts kills it after around 100 times.

• Discharging to 3 volts kills it after around 10 000 times

• Discharging to 3.5 volts kills it after 100 000 times

• Charging to 4 volts kills it after 100 000 times

• Charging to 4.2 volts kills it after 10 000 times

• Charging to 4.3 volt kills it after 1000 times

• Charging to 4.4 volts kills it after 100 times

• Charging to 4.5 has s significant chance of it catching fire

Now choose how many charge cycles you want it to survive, and you know which voltage to consider 0% and which to consider 100%. The bigger difference, the bigger capacity with the same battery.

This is why a phone with 0% battery can tell you that it’s out of battery.

You can also adjust what “killed” means. Is it when battery capacity is reduced to 80%? 50%?

I have to repeat - the numbers are not accurate, and this is strongly simplified.

It’s just an illustration of what 0% and 100% means it’s just where you are on the useful range, according to the manufacturers definition of useful.

Just to be clear: Do you want a way to save anything interesting that might happen, or do you want to save everything as automatically as possible?

Not all foreigners are criminals. But all members of a gang are gang members.

Isn’t it illegal in US, to be a member of an organization that has an obviously criminal purpose and/or obviously criminal methods?

What is the odds that court is where you go?

There’s so many other outcomes I keep hearing about in your news, but I don’t know the odds.

Det er altså lidt interessant at læse om er nyt projekt i nyhederne, sidde på kontoret og blive enige om at der ender galt og hvordan det ender galt, og så måneder eller år senere læse at vi havde ret.

Hvis vi kan se det, bare ud fra hvad der bliver givet til medierne, så er der helt klart interne medarbejdere der kan se det. Og ledere der har taget beslutningen, som burde kunne se det.

Det sker for tit til at det kan forklares med at ledelsen ikke lytter til medarbejderne.

Jeg har selv set “fejlende” projekter, hvor ledelsen tydeligvis havde en anden agenda end de påstod.

Det er ret svært i bedste fald. Er der så den mindste komplikation, kan det være umuligt. Og hvor mange er lige “helt normal” og uden “men’er”.

En af mine venner måtte vise over 700 siders dokumentation på at de faktisk er partnere, før de fik lov til at flytte sammen i Danmark. Deres udfordring var at de ikke var gift. Det er da helt normalt i Danmark.

En bekendt vil gerne have kæresten på besøg i Danmark, men de skal dokumentere at hun tager hjem igen inden hendes visum udløber. De har brugt en del måneder på at finde ud af hvordan man gør det, når de ikke anerkender hendes faktiske årsager.

Bare for at nævne de to simpleste.

Jeg ved ikke hvor mange sager der er om folk der bliver smidt ud på tyndt grundlag, og hvor tit der faktisk er gode grunde, som de ikke lige siger til pressen.

Men jeg kender personligt lidt for mange der ikke kan være sammen med sin partner, på grund af tossede regler, som må være designet til en helt anden situation.

Og lidt for mange som måtte kæmpe hårdt.

Lidt for mange, til at kunne tro på at de alle er særlige undtagelser.