Do what the fund managers do and set a % range for books unread in your library - no more than 30% no less than 20, perhaps
Cycle volumes in and out. Gotta close that loop. Then each year do a count to monitor growth and shelving needs
SORTED I’m Gordon ramsey
I’d be careful yknow, I hear they hired Barry Zuckercorn
Buttmash the kb. Your assword is ready sir 🐼
Scrutability is the basis of accountability
Didn’t realize the device in my pocket was google’s
I have a young calathea ornata
YT says mist it every day and whatever you do, DON’T MIST IT as mould will form, and says it prefers hours of indirect sunlight and also low light conditions such as beneath a canopy -_-
Conflict? A good image is a good image regardless of its provenance. And yes 2020s era 4chan was pretty much glowboy central, one look at the top posts by country of origin said as much. It arguably wasn’t worth bothering with since 2015
That is the point at which you remind them they are focusing on the worst R and remind them of the other two which are much more ppwerful
Interesting to compare aluminium recycling with plastic recycling
When the true aim is to recycle material, industry comes to the party and you get a refund scheme, even purpose built deposit facilities that can be set up locally
When the aim is to misdirect public attention toward a non solution you get government mandated plastics recycling bins and penalties or “contamination” plus never ending messaging (gotta keep the lie alive with constant repetition lmaooo). Coercion is just a lowkey admission that the material isn’t worth recycling
The real question isn’t how to get the plastics industry to change, it’s how to make the ruse no longer a tenable position for governments
None of that counts for anything unless the technologies can be independently developed and controlled by individuals and networks of people
let commercial implementation and intent be as opaque as it wants provided people aren’t required to interact with it
it’s the anonymity that empowers people to say the absolute worst things.
humans behave badly when they perceive they have social license to do so. anonymity has little to do with it
your second paragraph makes you sound like Larry Ellison. all you’re arguing for is the extension of the capacity of corporations to constrain and coerce invidiual behaviour, which is gross
The 1.17.8 flatpak onward doesn’t even work. Every IFO I give it comes back with ‘can’t read lol’ - it used to work flawlessly for remuxes
IF YOU DIDN’T PHONE HOME I WOULDN’T NEED A PRIVACY POLICY
But it is secure. Secure against you the genpop end user from being able to keep secrets or pursue interests that may not align with the government’s interests
Look at salt typhoon. The fact that 3P actors can use the exploit/bdoor too only matters to Gov to the extent that those actors can threaten its own interests by using it. Aka fuck the end user
Turning the clear web into a wasteland of corp/gov service portals one investigation at a time
that’s the point, to secure itself against $enemy-nation the state will first secure itself against the citizenry, by having a way of compromising citizens security on demand
ultimately governnment only cares that IT can exploit the mechanism, not that other actors cannot do so via the same mechanism
strip away all the obfuscation layers (there are so many lol) and thats pretty much the extent of the thought process of natsec orgs. you’re the threat. its an utterly retarded mind virus thats infected them we can all agree, but from an individual’s standpoint we can only protest and hope to shame the policymakers into a constructive course of action
Most school systems accidentally make reading a dreadful activity as the texts are tied to rote learning of facts and events for exam purposes
The big five publishers don’t seem to care about declining reading rates and continue to put out the same five or six types of books bc they don’t know how to market anything else
Ebooks don’t retail for competitive prices, both compared to hard copy books and to other media