

If i’m not mistaken, i vaguely remember some rule about how you cannot condemn an accomplice if you cannot condemn the culprit. Could be wrong though and maybe they can still be condamned for something else.


If i’m not mistaken, i vaguely remember some rule about how you cannot condemn an accomplice if you cannot condemn the culprit. Could be wrong though and maybe they can still be condamned for something else.


Merci beaucoup pour avoir tout peaufiné à ton retour ! Pour les gens qui voient l’info passer, n’hésitez pas à jeter un oeil à la traduction d’ici quelques jours et à nous faire des retours :D


C’est sûr que c’est compliqué, et je blâme d’autant moins les ukrainien.nes pour ce genre de rancoeur, ça me fait plus bizarre quand c’est des gens sur le fediverse, qui a priori ne sont pas impliqué.es là dedans.
Et autant je comprends que ton objectif pragmatique soit de causer le plus de tort possible aux gens d’en face, autant là ce qui me révulse d’autant plus c’est de le présenter comme une raison en soi, au même titre que protéger les ukrainien.nes ou lutter pour ses idéaux.


J’ai toujours eu un peu de mal avec les gens qui au-delà de défendre l’Ukraine, souhaitent le malheur des Russes autant ou plus que de la Russie, genre qui appellent à ce qu’il y ait encore plus de Russes qui meurent, et ça m’a fait le même sentiment quand ce taré expliquait que dans les trois raisons qu’il avait d’être là, la troisième était de tuer un maximum de russes.


Fair comment, though in real life the space near the tracks is either non-existent either uneven ground filled with rocks and plants, but as other pointed out it could be on roofs, parking lots, etc. Also, apparently the SNCF says they are specifically testing how much it complicates maintenance, so they are aware of this, but even then it’s less direct to test for that, and maybe built it in the future, than to built it in already adapted places.


In the same sense, there recently was a disclosure of footages of this kind of camera during a massive protest in france, with thousands on each side. It was very violent, with two protesters into coma if i’m right. Turns out, police forces were told beforehand to “record to prove we’ve done nothing wrong”. The result is hours of footages of insults, illegal use of their gear, call to use lethal weapons, and pleasure of sending people to hospital, because those morons forgot to turn the cameras off when those happened.


Bah tiens, c’est vrai que 2026 était pas assez déprimante comme ça


Cannot replicate on Firefox 147.0.2, Android 9, from the instance tarte.nuage-libre.fr
Could it be on newer versions of Android?


Salut! Elles se passent sur un serveur Zulip, hébergé en marge de l’instance pilote, sur chat.piefed.social si j’ai bien suivi. Ceci dit, si jamais c’est embêtant pour toi mais que c’est un sujet qui t’intéresse, on peut faire un écho ici, pour t’inclure dans les discussions.


The point is precisely not to remove the stone if someone with pertinent knowledge/expertise/whatever says it’s a bad thing, because then their authority makes temporarily sense.


100%.
The point is precisely that we trust the advice of the architect in this matter because they are more knowledgeable than us, not because they or someone else imposed their authority on us.
And if they talk shit about how to educate children in the orphanage, we won’t trust their advice because they are not knowledgeable then, and we do not let them impose their authority on us.


As shown by the hexbear comrade here, a lot of people just assume that no leader equals chaos. I find very hard to deconstruct this assumption, i think because it is deeply rooted in our societies. What i usually do is to point out that it’s not leaders that bring order, but organization. Most people then say “well yes, but you can’t have good organization without leaders”, which is more manageable to discuss, though most of the times people didnt change their mind in my experience. My main argument, which can take many forms, is that there are lot of times in our lives where we organize without leaders : in some families / homes, during trips with friends, when playing casual games or sports, even in some demos or movements.
It doesn’t really answer you question, but there’s a passage of Bakunin’s God And The State that i really like, where they point out that authority does not necessarily mean leader. So if you can convince someone that it’s authority they like and not leaders, you can then bring up the anarchist version of authority : restricted in time, matters and always up to debate.
Does it follow that I reject all authority? Far from me such a thought. In the matter of boots, I refer to the authority of the bootmaker; concerning houses, canals, or railroads, I consult that of the architect or engineer. For such or such special knowledge I apply to such or such a savant. But I allow neither the bootmaker nor the architect nor the savant to impose his authority upon me. I listen to them freely and with all the respect merited by their intelligence, their character, their knowledge, reserving always my incontestable right of criticism censure. I do not content myself with consulting authority in any special branch; I consult several; I compare their opinions, and choose that which seems to me the soundest. But I recognize no infallible authority, even in special questions; consequently, whatever respect I may have for the honesty and the sincerity of such or such an individual, I have no absolute faith in any person. Such a faith would be fatal to my reason, to my liberty, and even to the success of my undertakings; it would immediately transform me into a stupid slave, an instrument of the will and interests of others.


+1. I ragequit windows when it reinstalled Teams during an OS update, just after i uninstalled it.


What’s the difference between hug and cuddle? My frenchie ass always thought they were the same


Interesting numbers for people who dont wanna read :


It was a quite debated matter amongside law specialists, if i remember my time learning it. Like there was an obligation of community in the text, translated as an obligation of sexuality in jurisprudence since more than a century, but some recent interpretation of it were far more tolerant. I remember one case where judges ruled that a lesbian woman married to an asexual man for the apparences, and both living their sexual lives separately was still proper marriage because they cared for each other. Still was kind of an exception though, i’m happy to see it change officially at last.


It seems to be a real anthropology concept, and it kinda makes sense for my experience as french, i guess you could be in a relationship without saying “we are bf/gf”, though it seems odd to not talk about your feelings if the relationship goes on for multiple dates.
I don’t know what i think about this concept, partly because one justification is “countries with a very diverse population are more low context” and france is a mix of a lot of cultures, but i guess it’s true in some ways.


Si c’est le cas, c’est assez cool pour le Fediverse, ça lui fera ptet même de la pub, mais c’est juste chiant pour les jeunes. Ceci dit j’ai lu la proposition de loi avec les amendements et j’y ai pas retrouvé d’histoire de liste. Par contre, actuellement le texte exclut les encyclopédies en ligne, les plateformes éducatives et les plateformes de développement ou partage de logiciels libres de cette règle des 15 ans.


Oui complètement, et tout le merdier autour des sites pornos fait un peu office de coup d’essai en l’occurrence
Y’a énormément de bonnes choses dans cette école, qui pour moi se partagent surtout entre petites classes, dialogue hyper poussé, et activités alternatives (genre ateliers pratiques, méthodes innovantes, etc.), mais par contre les relents de patriotisme, moralisme, méritocratie et autoritarisme, ça me fait vraiment gerber. Fondamentalement, ne pas chercher à adapter l’enseignement aux élèves mais d’attendre que les élèves s’y adaptent en maniant le bâton et la carotte, c’est déprimant. Et tout ça me chiffonne d’autant plus qu’au global, c’est un résultat positif qui porte ces travers là.