Every opinion I have is my own. Every opinion I have is subject to change without notice. If you think my opinion is incorrect, change it with facts (citations needed). Be kind. Be cool. Be yourself.

  • 4 Posts
  • 96 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月8日

help-circle














  • SkaraBrae@lemmy.worldtoAutism@lemmy.worldTravel Day Two Rant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 个月前

    Your coach sounds like an arse. Every runner knows: nothing new on race day! You eat what you ate when you were training. You stick to your familiar routines… Obviously, travelling away from home makes some adjustments necessary, but you keep it as normal as possible.

    Well done on a good race under difficult conditions.



  • Yeah… 😬 That climate change example was a bit of a stretch. I was just highlighting how easy it is to mislead people with part of the picture, rather than the whole ugly mess.

    I still think that omitting studies into the cause of ADHD that don’t include Tylenol is misrepresenting the data.

    If there are 1000 studies into the cause of ADHD, and only 50 mention Tylenol, then omitting the other 950 is dishonest. Let’s say 25 of the 50 find a correlation, then 25/50 is way different to 25/1000! That’s where I see the P-hacking.

    Thanks for being civil, too.


  • SkaraBrae@lemmy.worldtoScience@mander.xyz*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 个月前

    No, it doesn’t. It returns studies that contain Tylenol AND ADHD. There’s an immediate bias in favour of the hypothesis. They should be searched separately, then you would look at how many contain both, then look at how many correlate the two. Presenting only the data that correlates the two is presenting that data out of context: choosing the data to fit the hypothesis. P-hacking.

    The media has done the same thing with climate change. They present for debate one scientist ‘for’ climate change and one scientists ‘against’ climate change as though there is a 50/50 chance that climate change is real, despite 99% of scientists falling on the ‘for’ side. A balanced debate would have involved 100 climate scientists with ‘1’ against and 99 ‘for’. Instead we now have people who think that climate change denial is reasonable because the data was presented in an unbalanced, or biased, way.

    If you only present that data that you think is relevant then you bias the result in your favour. If the data for all studies investigating the cause of ADHD was included, and then the % including Tylenol, then the % correlating Tylenol with ADHD, you would have a very different number… A much more honest one.




  • Not a traumatic brain injury…

    It’s a change in perspective. It’s hard to explain without referencing the experience itself.

    It’s like spending your whole life at the bottom of a valley. You have everything you need. Your life is whole. And then someone takes you to the top of a mountain and you can see a million valleys and a million mountains and an endless sky. Your valley is the same, it hasn’t changed, but suddenly everything is different. Your life is still whole, but that means something else, now.

    That doesn’t do it justice, but hopefully you get the picture…