If you use the Japanese name of a show with a well-known English name while speaking English just to be more obtuse, I think that’s fair to criticize.
- 0 Posts
- 25 Comments
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Netflix enshittification will continue until morale improvesEnglish
12·2 年前Then why are 2012 and 2016 included? It’s extremely confusing to have a line graph over time where intervals of time are missing, even if you clearly call attention to it, which they don’t here.
JPEG XL has gone through waxing and waning support from each of the major browsers, but Safari is the only one to support it by default.
I think in Scenario A you die if you flip the switch.
Which comes out to about 1/7 of a person in that room being shot per year.
This is standard for how they do technical inspections. They can’t check every rule on every car, so they check just a few important ones for every car (fuel, weight, etc) and then do random checks on a handful of cars each for others. The idea is to prevent it from being worthwhile to break the rule, while also requiring substantially fewer resources. That’s probably also why the penalty is so steep: if it was a slap on the wrist that you had a small chance of being caught for, you might as well just always run out-of-spec.
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Maybe AI won't be taking all of our jobs after all?
5·2 年前Oh no, vanilla extract is back!
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Reddit is killing blockchain-based Community PointsEnglish
1·2 年前The version of Community Points used on r/CryptoCurrency
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
The Onion@midwest.social•Confused Elon Musk Accidentally Kills Female Employee and Impregnates MonkeyEnglish
4·2 年前On the bright side, the monkey can’t tell anybody and most of my employees are scheduled to die anyway.
Absolutely brutal
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Reddit’s blockchain-based “Community Points” rewards crash after sunsettingEnglish
8·2 年前Likely only Reddit can say. I don’t think Reddit was ever trying to make money off Community Points directly (in contrast to their NFTs), but rather to boost engagement. Whether or not it did, and by enough to offset the costs of starting and maintaining the system, we’ll likely never know.
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Comic Strips@lemmy.world•Equation by Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
3·2 年前No, it might help to add a “the” before “perception”.
The color bands go over the spikes
Sex workers is a more broad term though, is there a term for sex workers who have sex with customers?
I had no idea you could even get it on Steam
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Unity deleted these terms, don't let them get outEnglish
8·2 年前Nobody here is arguing from direct information, just implications of vague statements. Here’s where they spell it out in more detail:
https://forum.unity.com/threads/unity-plan-pricing-and-packaging-updates.1482750/
Q: How are you going to collect installs? A: We leverage our own proprietary data model. We believe it gives an accurate determination of the number of times the runtime is distributed for a given project.
Q: If a user reinstalls/redownloads a game, will that count as multiple installs? A: We are not going to charge a fee for reinstalls. The spirit of this program is and has always been to charge for the first install and we have no desire to charge for the same person doing ongoing installs. (Updated, Sep 14)
Note the update there. They completely walked back their previous answer:
Q: If a user reinstalls/redownloads a game / changes their hardware, will that count as multiple installs? A: Yes. The creator will need to pay for all future installs. The reason is that Unity doesn’t receive end-player information, just aggregate data.
Which has lead to a lot of confusion. It seems like their “proprietary data model” is focused on another point, which is preventing install spamming. Or maybe it’s also about reinstalls, even though they “don’t receive end-player information” so that was impossible a few days ago.
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Programming@programming.dev•What would it take for you to move away from Github?
1·2 年前Is everyone running their own open source project?
Essentially, I suppose. I put most of my personal projects on GitHub because a) I believe in the open-source philosophy generally and b) sometimes they are helpful to others! For example, because I put SmilApple on GitHub, someone was able to adapt it to make this. And besides, it’s a great way to distribute programs that you want other people to use, like my current project Chokistream, or when I made a fan-translation of a game. None of these are “serious” projects like a new framework or something, and all of them have very limited audiences, but if I’m coding them, I might as well publish them where someone else might be able to benefit from them. I also don’t feel like they’re important for my career, but they’re important for their own sake and I would care if I lost them.
Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Everything Made By an AI Is In the Public DomainEnglish
41·2 年前Also, this case does not make AI works uncopyrightable - only those that have no human input.
This is really important. The particular case tried a very difficult argument, that works created by machine have copyright regardless of human input, which no serious copyright experts thought would work because it’s been pretty comprehensively litigated that human creativity is required
They also tried to argue the much more plausible theory that the prompt had creativity, and that the copyright flows down from the prompt to the AI-generated work, but the type of suit they brought didn’t permit that argument. That theory still needs to be litigated, and while I would be a bit surprised to see it work, it’s entirely possible it will. So I’m not ready to say all AI-generated work is PD just yet.
Of course, regardless of if what comes out of the AI is PD, you can make enough modifications to a PD work and create something you can copyright. Many people are doing enough “touch-ups” to AI art that the final product is potentially copyrightable. Amusingly, the better the generator, the less the human has to do here, and the weaker the protection becomes.








Error correction helps a scanner account for portions of the code being obscured/unreadable, whereas a bad background can make a code not even recognizable as a code in the first place. (depending on the algorithm used, how bad it is, yadda yadda)