if he’s complaining about plaintext secrets, sure. But if he’s talking about using session cookies he is wrong and should know he is wrong.
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Web Development@programming.dev•CSS finally gets support for if() functionEnglish
13·6 个月前.foo { .nested { property: value; } }
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•Elixir v1.19 released: enhanced type checking, broader type inference, and up to 4x faster compilation for large projectsEnglish
2·6 个月前I was ‘just’ a JS dev in 2017 and learned Elixir for fun as my second language—worth looking at imo!
I dont like pizza that much as a staple in my diet (too unhealthy imo, it is delicious tho) so thats not too bad, but as a cali-born, kentucky-raised filipino, yes.
G has mexican, cajun, columbian, and tex mex. Seriously south florida is insane food choice as well. Hell, I can get california burritos too. D has filipino, thai, arabic, and indian. Incredible vegan options and protein options and who doesnt love spicy thai chicken and rice? Either of those and im set for life :)
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The inner fire of my hatred COULD melt steam beamsEnglish
3·7 个月前sounds like you shouldve been using a password manager this whole time :)
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•Does the AGPL license allows not disclosing the source of third party scripts (in)directly interacting with the main software?English
1·8 个月前Writing javascript (or any programming language, but sticking with ‘script’ here) to consume an http api from an agpl service (such as lemmy or mastodon) does not force you to open source whatever client you have.
Consuming an agpl client library (maybe mastodon or lemmy provide an sdk I dunno, or some third party one) and you embed it in your app and interact with that agpl code, then yes you must open your code up.
For example, there are closed source Mastodon clients that make a lot of money. Look at the mastodon client from tapbots. The owners of mastodon have a winning case if they sued them, if your logic held up. Tapbots can safely create an entire application and consume the mastodon api without worry, why can’t you and your script?
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•Does the AGPL license allows not disclosing the source of third party scripts (in)directly interacting with the main software?English
3·8 个月前Using an API isn’t distributing
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•Unpopular opinion: 95% percent of all modern programming langueges are either bloated/proprietary/unneccesarily complex. pretty sure C & assembly can do it all (even for web development,English
2·9 个月前Replace C with lisp and you’re 100% correct. Even then Rust is better than lisp IMO.
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•IP over Avian Carriers - WikipediaEnglish
2·9 个月前A neat side-effect of GraphQL being transport agnostic is that you can do things like GraphQL over a websocket or avian carrier :)
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Web Development@programming.dev•It's time for modern CSS to kill the SPAEnglish
82·9 个月前If only “fullstack” or “typescript” devs weren’t so scared of CSS. They can optimize a weird join, they know the Big O notation of a function that operates on a list that’ll never ever exceed a size of like 1000 items so who the fuck cares, but as soon as you ask them about grid, layers, container queries, or even what things like houdini can hopefully do one day, they just collectively shit themselves.
What corporations and enterprise software development practices have done to the web makes me crash out, sorry. Very few people who actually care about CSS are making a living wage making things with it as their job.
0xDREADBEEF@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•Frontend Language Feature MatrixEnglish
2·9 个月前I love that little language. I learned ReasonML for fun and built a few toy apps a long time ago, but ReScript has been cool to watch
I mean, to make such a point that the only point of the page was simply to satisfy a requirement of someone else’s volition and yet creating that page and apparently saying what you’re saying—seems like there’s something misaligning here :P
Also I no doubt that they hate people who talk too much and hate making jokes — there’s some seriously unserious stuff inside of the rules they posted. They are serious folks who have zero tolerance for laughter apparently :D
My headcanon is they’re a bunch of people who have a super religious supplier with strict checkbox rules and they are fucking with them.
SQLite devs are trolls to their suppliers that’s great 😂
ie a Swedish circlejerk subreddit?


You are limiting your own intelligence by thinking companies can be described in those words.
They are not good. They are profit-seeking. Profit seeking doesn’t necessarily mean evil, but it can never mean good. A non-profit who’s goal is to improve their community around them, a co-op who’s goal is to treat their workers with respect etc etc can all be described as ‘good’ to varying degrees, but no for-profit entity, especially a publicly traded one, can ever be described as ‘good’