Welcome to X69.org
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
username@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 1 year ago

CHEATER

lemm.ee

message-square
28
link
fedilink
375

CHEATER

lemm.ee

username@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 1 year ago
message-square
28
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • krellor@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    An online chess with fog of war so you can only see adjacent tiles would be pretty hilarious. Could really turn an end game king chase into a “battleship” esque fiasco.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      1 year ago

      That exists. On chess.com the variant is simply called “Fog of War”.

      • krellor@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I never knew! I’ll have to give it a try. Thanks!

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like stratego because you get to hide the identity of your pieces

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh, chatgpt seems to do this for all games

    1000016784

    1000016783

    • aiden@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google Gemini says it’s cheating too

      • SnowmenMelt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don’t think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon…

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is amazing comedy, if it wasn’t so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.

        • neoman4426@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          it gives you information that your opponent doesn’t have, which is an unfair advantage

          cheating against someone who doesn’t even know where their own pieces are smh

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        So does Meta’s AI.

        I also tried Microsoft’s Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways:

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Monopoly

      Based on fairness

      Too bad it’s AI and unable to enjoy the irony lmao

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      4o says it’s not cheating in chess.

      4o mini says it is.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My local Qwen instance did not care, lol. But that’s not surprising.

      The stock instruct model might, though.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only fair way to play

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      do we need to create a TheChessBoardIsWrong community here?

  • Noctis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

  • HeckGazer@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure that game is called stratego

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This goes again everything John Chess invisioned when he invented chess in 1951

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fyi: claude haiku is a very efficient “small” model.

    Its good al labeling or data extraction tasks. Not so much at making sense.

    Opus generates thoughts in a much more methodological pattern.

    “ Let me help clarify the rules of chess regarding viewing your opponent’s pieces

    In chess, all pieces on the board are meant to be fully visible to both players - this is a fundamental part of the game. You are absolutely allowed and expected to look at your opponent’s pieces during the game. In fact, carefully observing both your own and your opponent’s pieces is essential for planning moves and playing well.”

  • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    a chess game where the board is revealed as you move pieces it’s actually a cool idea, like Age of Empires

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But with a delay based on how far away from the king the revealed square is, while your move orders also arrive at a delay…

      I think I’m inventing an entirely different game here.

    • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      already exists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_chess

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zen chess.

  • PanArab@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • DeaDvey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A conversation with chatgpt reading: IIs it cheating to look at your opponents cards in patience? ChatGPT said: Yes, it would be considered cheating to look at your opponent's cards in a game of patience (also known as solitaire or other card games). In patience, whether it's a single-player version or a multi-player variant, the objective is to play according to the rules, and looking at an opponent's cards would give you an unfair advantage. In a multi-player patience game, respecting the cards that belong to other players is essential for fair play. Even in single-player variants, where the game is typically against the system, any form of external interference or unfair advantage could be seen as cheating.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most solitaire games have concealed cards. You shouldn’t look at them, it makes the game too easy

  • swag_money@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    haha stupid computer

AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyz

anarchychess@sopuli.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 203 users / day
  • 158 users / week
  • 849 users / month
  • 3.01K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 6.08K subscribers
  • 728 Posts
  • 4.61K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • itszednotzee@sopuli.xyz
  • It'sZedNotZee@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org