REdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agoDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.comREdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square36linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarearthurpizza@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoThis is not a violation of the GPL. They are allowed to charge for access to the source. If you provide binaries/images to a customer, you also must provide source. However, anyone who doesn’t pay isn’t entitled to it. However, this is still a total bonehead move.
This is not a violation of the GPL. They are allowed to charge for access to the source. If you provide binaries/images to a customer, you also must provide source. However, anyone who doesn’t pay isn’t entitled to it.
However, this is still a total bonehead move.