Hahaha, what a story, Mark! Anyway, how’s your sex life?
“define ‘sex’. no, wait… define ‘life’.”
Well, someone at facebook needs to come collect their jerk-off trophy.
Zuck, you dirty wanker.
I think they already came
yes, and epstein trafficked all those children to himself.
💀
As an aside, a great deal of CSAM is shared through Facebook, they’ve been asked by CSAM survivors to stop this and they said no. The advocacy survivor group Phoenix 11 submitted six formal questions in the US Congress to old Zuckface fuckface about it, as he deployed end to end encryption which makes this possible, which he dodged like the lying fuck he is. Zuck would sell it himself if it made him a whole dollar and nobody should forget that.
I completely disagree with your take here.
The idea that we shouldn’t have services with end to end encryption because “think of the children” is an absurd take to have.
I think you’re being upvoted because its anti Zuckerberg, but seriously people, think about the long term consequences of not being able to chat without being spied on.
Yeah, that argument is shit wrapped in a candy shell. Too many people’ll swallow it without so much as a blink. 🥲
A case of indoctrination by the government, that’s what they expect - a stream of false narratives utilising children as the weapon.
Which is frustrating as every single time the government wanted to expand surveillance on regular citizens, preventing this is always touted as the justification. Now we have all the surveillance and the monopolies are like ‘Nah, exploitation is profitable’.
Zuck’s just an omega-level gooner, swearsies!
Why do you think Facebook exists?
Basically its inception tbh
Incestion?
Omegle gooner? I’d believe it.
Groomer
“So just to get this straight, you’re saying you have downloaded 152 … zettabytes … of porn for your own personal use?”
deleted by creator
“…Zetabaytes? no. <mumbles on a hot mic> it was yottabytes”
Thats BabyGroku-bytes
rookie numbers for a bunch of 20 something programmers tbh
Where did they get the idea that that’s a more respectable response?
EDIT: Doesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Dignity doesn’t matter if it wins the case.
Welcome to Zucc’s Fucc & Succ
Zuck’s Fuck and Suck sounds like his product’s effects on society.
We’re Sneed’s Feed & Seed now, please get it right
They didn’t claim it was respectable, they claimed it made them not liable? Where’d you get this idea?
Doesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Why should a company be legally responsible for copyright infringement of its employees, if it wasn’t something they did for work?
If you or I can be held responsible for such activities from our homes, why give google an exemption?
It would depend on jurisdiction of course, many of us live places that will give us(with help of a lawyer…) a bit of an out for guest wifi or TOR exit nodes, but ultimately, you know google is going to settle for little more(or less) than it would have cost them to buy these works at retail, whereas you or I would also get slapped with thousands of dollars extra(per item?) in fines and legal fees.
They can afford to pay for the porn, but they chose to go the “we shouldn’t have to because its smut” route, and not bother trying to say their employees are responsible for downloading random books/movies/whatever for personal use. Do they get to use this out for CP?
Also, unlike you or I, they have logging in place, such that they know which employees did what. Not saying they should name-and-shame, but they could(and should) easilly eat the cost and pass it through to those employees, whether it also comes with HR disciplinary action ornot.
I think it’s more respectable to provide unfiltered internet than it is to profit off someone else’s work without paying them.
Did anyone check on the Meta engineers in the goon cave?
You’re joking but it was 2400 movies over 7 years downloaded individually and not in bulk like they blatantly did with books. Apparently over 60% of adults admit to have viewed porn at work so yeah… someone should probably check on the engineers in the goon cave.
I would not be surprised if Meta advertised such a thing to prospective employees as a legitimate benefit of the job. A built-in VR goon cave with 30 TB of material available. Limit 1 hour per person, bookings required 6 months in advance. Sessions subject to monitoring for security and training purposes. May contain trace amounts of Zuck.
Wouldn’t need any material. Hooks up to your fb and you can pick which of your pals to hook up to the milking table.
Then you should be less credulous. What is told to prospective employees is effectively public information.
I can only imagine the smell of dried cum and server stacks in an enclosed space
Nah, Zuck doesn’t let a drop go to waste.
Mandatory gooning during the dailies at meta.
The Matagoon cave sounds like something from the Unix Surrealism universe.
“hey steve, did you download a shitton of porn while on the company network?”
“Uuuhhhhh, it’s for ai training”Torrent the Dark Knight to watch at home along and the media companies will sue you for infinity billion dollars. Openly torrent every movie known to man to train an AI and the media companies don’t do shit.
Steal 1 movie, you’re a murderer, steal 1million, you’re a conquerer, steal 'em all? You’re a goooooooood~
this comment is oc, DO NOT steal
Too late, but it’s ok, i’ll only keep it for personal use
You wouldn’t steal a car.
You wouldn’t right click and save an NFT.
Piracy. It’s a crime.
Some things are too good to be true
https://torrentfreak.com/sorry-the-you-wouldnt-steal-a-car-anti-piracy-ad-wasnt-pirated-170625/
Much appreciated. Thank you
Ah, so the anti pirate lobby still pirated the composers music. Just not for the famous ad.
That doesn’t work unless you also “steal” all the media companies’ money so now they don’t have any to pay the lawyers.
Well in this case they are trying to do something… This whole “personal use” thing is Meta’s response to a copyright claim against them.
It’s not a personal Jellyfin server, it’s training material for a possible future AGI. It’s going to know a lot about terrible horror movies.
Humanity is fucked letting these companies exist.
An even more “glaring” defect, Meta argued, is that Meta’s terms prohibit generating adult content, “contradicting the premise that such materials might even be useful for Meta’s AI training.”
Oh yes, this is true because meta, or any other company for that matter, has never ever in the history of ever changed its terms of service…
I can only assume the MPAA will funnel vast sums of money into helping prosecute these thieves? Any minute now right?
One wonders how much child porn was in there…
But it’s AI, so itsa aaaaalllll fine
It’s better to say child sex abuse material (csam), the term “child porn” both legitimizes the conent, and infers children could ever be active and consenting participants
sexualised content involving children is abuse and should be labled as so
Also, there are far too many things with the acronym, cp
Chris Parnell. That’s one.
It’s kinda weird how spwsific you have to be with certain models to not make them vwry very young looking people
