Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won’t be voted in.
Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.
I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of “use with caution” instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user’s personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.
For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that’s why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.
On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we’ll be happy to help you out.
Unruffled
Hi mateys. I’m gonna keep this short and sweet because I don’t really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we’d prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.
This post isn’t to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn’t know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it’s worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.
But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve harmonya ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?
I’d also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.
Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?
Because this might be a divisive topic, I’m setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.
The proposal is as follows:
That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.
Notes
- AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don’t know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
- We really don’t want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
- If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
- I’ve covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I’ll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.
expiry: 7
Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591

This is a simple majority vote. The final tally is as follows:
- For:

- Against:
(5),
(2),
(4),
(3),
(1),
(1) - Local Community: -0.6
- Outsider sentiment: Positive
- Total: -10.6
- Percentage: 25.00%
This vote has concluded on 2025-07-23 03:17:20 UTC
Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.
how the heck am i supposed to read this somebody help 😭
Removed by mod
“local community” is dbzer0 users who don’t get an individual vote as they’re not supported or vouched for, but are tallied together at a 1/10 ratio.
“total” is the absolute for minus against tally.
For an exact tally at 2025-07-19 13:55 UTC:
Internal: 85 for, 149 against
Outside: 39 for, 20 against
This info is from gregtech.eu I think, with 17 upvotes and 0 downvotes unaccounted for from defederated instances like .ml and hexbear (hexbear has downvotes disabled).The huge negative total is from the supporter votes.
As an aside, I think when one of the tallies of “For” or “Against” has enough votes to turn from a list to a bucket-list (i.e. object and number of occurrences, not a list of objects with repeats), then the other should do the same. Else it’s a bit confusing to read.
deleted by creator
Yes, but votes from other instances are just counted as “outsider sentiment”
- For:
One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don’t want that on my feed.
And to a lesser extent I don’t want to see weird tankie bootlicking of China either. And I’m not talking about legit good things China has done when compared to other superpowers, I’m talking weird posts that read like full propaganda state sponsored bs, and if you disagree with them in any way they will dig through your intire account history to try and find something they can use instead of actually having a discussion about the topic you originally disagreed with.
Authoritarians don’t want open discussion they will just link you half a shitty book explaining how there’s actually no such thing as authoritarianism.
Edit: I’d like to add that searching lemmygrad for Ukraine will show some really awful takes. I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine, Tebet, Hong kong, el Salvador, ect just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn’t mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.
Authoritarians don’t want open discussion they will just link you half a shitty book explaining how there’s actually no such thing as authoritarianism.
Sounds like you’re the one who doesn’t want open discussion.
One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don’t want that on my feed.
One of your lines in the sand is when people are against colonialism and in favour of anti-colonial liberation, then. No doubt because you uncritically believe the same people who said ‘but Iraq has WMDs!’ and have lied about and demonised their other enemies.
I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine
Then you want Ukraine to be free from NATO, as opposed to being its yet another glorified military base meant to threaten the colonial hegemon’s enemies, to invade them, and to carry out terror attacks on NATO’s behalf.
Tebet
Tibet is not under serfdom. It was freed decades ago.
Hong kong
Good news. The colonial overlords in NATO have handed Hong Kong over a couple of decades ago.
just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn’t mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.
Considering that it’s ‘authoritarians’ who have contributed the most to anti-colonial liberation, this is a a massive self-report.
You speak in tounges witch!
You can always block the entire instance on your end
You do still get those in comment sections of dbzer posts then.
Also I’m not sure if lg posts on dbzer subs would essentially form enclaves, where if enough dbzer users block them they basically get the space for themselves but external visitors and new users are seeing that lemmygrad lite on our instance.A very good point that gets overlooked a lot in this discussion.
Removed by mod
I joined this instance because it drew a line in the sand. Non authoritarian spaces are so rare online.
Federating with grad doesn’t magically change the structure and makeup of this instance, it will still have the same governance, communities, admins etc…
And as already said, your personal boundaries are not violated by this, as you can define them yourself here on the Fediverse (there is a feature called “block”, yk)
What about freedom for Donbas, or Crimea? Are they allowed self determination or not because clearly those regions want absolutely nothing to do with the well documented Nazi infested Kiev regime?
Or North Korea? Do you think it would be better if the western occupied government that has turned the south into a fascist dystopia would be better? Do you truly trust what the west says about the DPRK?
My grandfather fought in the Korean war and I know exactly what we did to them, I cannot in good conscience blame them for their siege mentality, especially since the Korean war never really ended.
Look at Japan, they were “westernized” as well and look how that turned out.
Or how about those “pro democracy” protests in Hong Kong where people were waving British, American, and a disturbing number of Trump flags.
And since you mentioned Tibet (should probably try to at least spell it right). Some 80% of Tibetan people speak their native language still compared to less than 10% of indigenous people in America.
Would you rather Tibet still be a monarchist slave state? Would you rather women in China still be forced to engage in foot binding?
Western anarchists have a very severe issue of chauvinism that really really needs to be addressed and called out at every turn.
Can a north Korean speak out about government abuse? What about a south Korean? We both know the answers to that.
A classic tankie tactic is to talk about their atrocities as if there was no other choice. Fuck that noise. But you cought my spelling error while I’m on mobile so I guess you win this round! Fucking classic tankie! This is a small example of bad faith arguments I don’t enjoy spending much time on tbh. Can you say a single thing bad about China or North Korea? Just 1 maybe 2 if you’re hardcore? I generally spend more time talking about the problems of the west but the fact that tankies see no evil just makes me look at you the same as a dogmatic MAGA and I don’t want that on my feed either.
The west and east is responsible for a more atrocities than I can remember off the top of my head, but guess what it’s generally authoritarians doing everything than can to increase their domination. I opose authoritarianism. I understand the world is not going to reflect my beliefs any time soon.
China has brought so many out of poverty while investing in renewable energy and truly opensouce Ai I see that as good and it gives me hope. That doesn’t mean I’m not going to say I don’t smell shit when there’s shit on my face.
Do you understand the definition of chauvinism? I spend more time calling out western authoritarianism than eastern, and I see most western anarchists do the same.
Here’s a nifty shorthand to get into the correct campist mindframe: When the people in any region of the world go against the interests of Russia, China or their close allies, it’s a “color revolution”. When they go against the interests of USA or Europe or their close allies, it’s “self determination”.
Well, considering that NATO is always revealed to have a hand in instigating colour revolutions in its designated enemy countries, which tend to be aligned closer with Russia or the PRC, and that the uprisings that go against the interests of NATO are anti-colonial, that is a fair assessment by the ‘campists’.
Meanwhile, you are telling on yourself with the both-sidesing between colonialism and anti-colonial movements (which is overwhelmingly likely solely informed by the ‘Iraq has WMDs!’ style of propaganda).
Pretty ridiculous thing to say when there’s concrete evidence that almost all the major events that commonly get called color revolutions had US or other Western involvement behind them. Euromaidan, Guaido, the various movements in Georgia, the Hong Kong protests, and so on.
The exception are the more recent ones like the more recent events in Georgia and Bangladesh. I heard some people call the recent Serbian and Turkish protests a color revolution because of how incompetent they were, but I don’t think there’s really much reason to think they were sponsored by the US.
It would help your case if you could say when the anti-authoritarian, pro-freedom protests in countries associated with US enemy states haven’t been color revolutions, or when the US enemy states have sponsored similar things in Western countries.
Not gonna debate your conspiracy theories, mate.
I don’t think blindly following the US state department then telling anyone who tries to get you to see reality to go away is a great approach to finding truth. Do you also think the US overthrowing democratically elected leaders in Latin America like Arbenz and Allende is false? Or do you think those are true because they were long enough in the past they don’t cause you any cognitive dissonance?
I think you shouldn’t conflate your conspiracy theories with facts and I also think you shouldn’t sealion quite so much.
I just spent my lunch break checking out the instance and scrolling through the top weeks posts and checking out the comments.
Hard no.
-
Basically all their posts are political, except very pro-china, pro-marxist, anti-ukraine. Theres not a single post i consider a value add if it appeared in my scroll. Even if I gave the users and their viewpoints the benefit of the doubt, this would be like adding /r/china, /r/russia, /r/communism to my subs. I can’t think of a single reason i want this.
-
I’m not giving the users the benefit of the doubt. Their comments are indistinguishable from what a ccp or Russian employee would post.
All we would be doing is opening a potential vector for propagandists to attack. They post nothing of interest.
Buddy, Marxism is the liberatory ideology of the global south…
Also you can defed on your end anytime
Marxism is set in a post scarcity society, read. It has never been implemented. It will not be implemented while you or I draw breath on this earth. Mudak
Communism will only come when we have abolished class distinctions.
We can implement Marxist policies today, as a form of socialism
Everyone already implemented some kind of socialism years ago. It tends to be increasingly corrupt as the state grows.
LMAO, I would love to live in that world, but sadly, no.
Socialism means the working classes having control over the means of production, not whatever liberal revisionist definition you are usingOFC as a very basic definition
That is not what that word means in 21st century english. The word you’re looking for is probably Communism.
I don’t care for how a bunch of politically illiterate yankees/anglos misuse words of political economy
-
Big no.
Echoing from what some others have said, I went back 3 days worth of content from them and found ZERO worthwhile posts.
At least hexbear is somewhat funny in their shit posts, and it’s easy enough to block or filter users who constantly post in their begging for money community.
Meanwhileongrad exists for a reason. I’m content enough to see the smoke from the self immolation that happens from afar.
I never heard of Lemmygrad but after I saw this post I checked them out and I do not think it would be wise to federate with them. They seem terrible. They seem like they’re worse than hexbear.
It’s gonna be a no from me, fam
Not for me, no. IMO, a lot of the users over there are only interested in cosplaying authoritarianism, which I am not personally into.
while hexbear, .ml, and similar communities do engage in genuine praxis in the form of mutual aid and other such assistance forums, their rhetoric and dogma is enough to absolutely destroy any amicable sentiment that might build up imo.
everyone in the comments talking about leftist unity and historical awareness is an idiot and a hypocrite. historically whenever anarchism collaborate with the red fash, we get crushed on all sides. there isn’t an instance that has gone differently. we can be that instance.
the lack of genuine rhetoric, absolute widespread acceptance of bad faith argumentative tactics, and general behavior of .ml and hexbear’s communities are both so egregious as to warrant not federating with either community, honestly. i agree with the sentiment found elsewhere in these comments that i have nothing to be gained watching western incels post about how much they love north korea and daddy putin in my feed.
i can’t and won’t be friendly with people who espouse those views and honestly, if db0 were to start federating more of these communities it would denigrate the space enough to make me want to leave. part of what i like about here is that there is no weird snakey people trying to convince people of crazy fucking conspiracy theories. just anarchist nerds doing tech shit. if we invite these people in, we’ll lose ourselves. i don’t think i’d want to use a forum that will leave me associated, no matter how loosely, with literal fascists. it’s a big part of what drives me away from mainstream social media to here and if need be it will drive me away from here, too.
No, don’t need to see more tankie shite.
Big no from me
Absolutely not.
All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?
This is the wrong question. The correct question is, “has something materially changed at lemmygrad.ml since we defederated from them, and has it changed sufficiently to warrant refederation?”
My issue with grad was never their local content. Yes they have shitty propagandized tankie takes and deepthroat Mao and the North Korean state all the time, but I always filtered and blocked those sorts of communities, which is any user’s perogative. Hell, since we can blanket instance block on a user level these days, it’s even easier.
The issue was always their users picking fights outside of their instance and actively spreading dangerous misinformation in every community they can get their fingers in; then their admins doing nothing, if not actively encouraging, this sort of bad faith engagement. Grad, hex and ml would all to varying degrees end up on many news comms and try to flood them with a certain viewpoints. And if you get into their space with an opposing view point (e.g urgyhur genocide) you will be banned more often than not.
Look back in history and see why we defedded. Db0 made the call early on because he also realized they do not make any arguements in good faith and are, for any purposes, just fascists with a different kind of red flag that were directly antithetical to this lemmy’s principles. They were not worth the added moderation load to manage their users when they would get into our local comms then. And I doubt they’re worth it now.
I opened their site, and right off the bat I see at least three usernames I recognize as bad faith actors that I previously blocked, I can only assume their administrative structure has not changed a bit. Refederating will be a net negative for db0.
Off topic: I forgot how the governance system works, can someone link the post where it was implemented because I’m on mobile and search is really hard here. I don’t know how to see my vote tallied. ___
No thank you. I have zero interest in dealing with genocide apologists, regardless of their purported idealogical leanings.
But aren’t you already federated with .world?
Does that mean we need more?
Zionists are bad enough. I don’t need Maoists and Stalinstans in addition.
Hard disagree. Honestly, this would even be a compelling reason for me to leave this instance and spin up my own. I wanted to try out running an instance for quite some time now, and this would probably push me further toward that. That wouldn’t have an impact on my moderation efforts, e.g. in c/piracy; there would be a smooth transfer.
little rant
Honestly, there are even more points that bother me about this instance. For example, the outright hate for cryptocurrency. Yeah, I’m aware of the anarchist theory of having no money or currency at all, but the first step is perhaps creating a better currency/money system with fewer inherent issues. It’s hard to objectively judge whether crypto is better or worse per se, as there are always some positive and some negative aspects, but I don’t understand why an anarchist instance pushes for a state-controlled, state-issued currency and hates decentralized attempts to create a currency controlled by the people. Sure, I don’t like Bitcoin either, especially because of the privacy concerns, but Monero is a solid option with privacy/anonymity as a core design feature and an algorithm that makes using GPUs or ASICs unfeasible to try to democratize the mining process. At the same time, the criticism of AI, a similarly controversial topic, is restricted by policy. This doesn’t make sense to me. I neither love nor hate AI, and I neither love nor hate cryptocurrency, but I think we should be able to have healthy and constructive debates/discussions about both without any instance-wide restrictions.
We’re pro-GenAI and anti-crypto, because I started this instance, and those are my takes. I wanted to attract people who think the same way as I do in my instance.
I don’t see any saving graces to cryptocurrencies. They’re just a scam gallore. Monero sounds good in theory until you realize that not only is it not used nearly enough to prove it scales (all crypto doesn’t), but that it also makes everyone using it engage in money laundering by design.
We also don’t prevent GenAI criticism as a blanket rule. I criticise corporate GenAI and its hype plenty. We just have a rule to prevent GenAI haters causing flamewars under every goddamn GenAI image
KEEP OUT THE TANKIES :p

wths th1s supp0sed t0 m34n? th1s w4sn’t 1n th3 c0mm3nt
User flairs.
Edited to add: See “About voting rights and flairs” in the sidebar.
wtf, why is it 4 quid to vote
Removed by mod
oh srry I skimmed through the flare page and thought you had to donate to vote
You don’t have to pay to vote, you just have to pay to have your vote counted equally, which I find very very dubious.
We hold votes on hexbear but without any of this weighting.
I am anti censorship and we need the users to develop critical thinking, because then the problem would eliminate itself. However, as instance owners, you (unfortunately) have the responsibility what content is visible on your instance, even if it is just some copy from somewhere else (the law is not quite compatible with distributed systems). This means, you have to block any extremist views which could endanger any of your instance’s users (even visitors, technically). So even if it is censorship, the survival of this instance is of more value, than to enforce pure anarchy.
I am for blocking lemmygrad. And hexbear. And @[email protected].
In others words: don’t ever federate again.
This is an “extremist” instance 💀💀💀
That’s the thing many people do not understand. There is nothing more central than pure anarchy, where each individual can have extremist views. However, the more extreme your views are, the less weight your voice has.
Anarchy in it of itself is “extremist” from a liberal POV. The whole categorisations of “extremism” is a liberal concept


















