The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires, is pursuing a very instructive line in relation to the war.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1915/may/01c.htm

For all his problems??

Well I don’t speak British do I??

Yeah, it’s called performance art. You’re not wrong in disliking it as slop, but the barrier for what is art is empirically low.

Jokes on you, putting up bullshit in an art gallery is a classic art move.

on threat of imprisonment.

finished that for you.

That’s clearly a soul caliber character.

Well Windows sales might, but that’s why you gotta pay for pro mode that removes all the ad shit. Otherwise they would lose out on the additional 2/5 or whatever that comes from their ad-ware

I am less sympathetic about it. He says it’s a love letter wrapped in a complaint, essentially saying ‘Windows is shitty because of all the enshitification they’ve done’, yeah bud, we know.

The engineer assumes far too much good faith by Microsoft. He focuses on the idea that Windows was built for casual users and the online vocal power users that want to stretch the normal use of the system don’t like how their strange choices are handled and yell online setting the narrative. His advice boils down to, 'give a power user mode that lets you control the telemetry, turns off ads and searches in your start menu, lets you boot without an online account, bundle all OEM installed apps in one bundle, respecting changing defaults like web browser." Like, sweetheart, I’m gonna hold your hand when I say this, Microsoft didn’t stumble backwards into including ads and locking out offline accounts, they are incentivized to be shit like this.

He suggests in addition to buying windows it having a monthly fee for this pro mode to allow for such freedoms, “because they can’t just give windows away forever hoping to make it up on OneDrive fees.” Cool, I’d rather stick to linux, thanks.

deleted by creator

Hasn’t she’s been a figure on the “SWJs are ruining the world” side of youtube for almost a decade now?

Since the other comment was a bit flippant and didn’t really understand or care to explain genuinely.

I believe Materialism here is being used as a subset of a broader Marxist idea of Dialectical Materialism. The whole concept is pretty dense, but the core idea, and the subset being used here, is that the conditions people live in are the larger driver of their actions. So crime does not come from an innate spiritual poison one possesses, but from conditions that inspire criminal behavior in people, such as poverty and wealth inequality.

“Material conditions” is a common leftist phrase that summarizes the ideas materialism, so speaking to ‘conditions’ as Mamdani did can be a bit of a dog whistle for leftist ideas.

In short, to quote Kamala Harris, “You think you just fell out of a coconut tree? You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you”

Busses can’t be free if his radical left wing agenda breaks all the busses. Checkmate commie.

Or women don’t duck with two wheels

What’s the over under on the courts giving a shit after the thousands spent on legal costs?

Justice often is.

Anything ever come of this creep and his “favorite magic tricks” usb drive?

deleted by creator

Only for him to call for another trial when the obviously good vaccines provably work.

I think they mean “Verhältnis” (google says ‘relationship’) doesn’t really mean ratio, but ratio is what we use in english.