But 👺Alternative Vote👺 is slightly confusing for the plebs! Impossible. We must keep this simple system that disenfranchises basically everyone.

Yeah the air pollution is what I’d be most worried about if this becomes scalable.

lol, no

White Collar Crime -> Couple years in country club federal camp

Poor People Crime -> 20 to life in a zoo cage

Absolutely flawless ragebait troll if it was one.

123 out of 205 NHS hospital trusts have already adopted Palantir’s data system.

The only thing Orwell was wrong about was the dates.

Trump has directed lighting changes at White House events to appear less orange.[3

I usually don’t find people’s insecurities funny but this is the hilarious exception imo

Nope. Ozempic isn’t available to everyone. As always the rich benefit the poor do not.

oh just for context I’m not seriously suggesting more Levy lmao my comment was ironic

“Unification” = Prussian dominance through conquering, alliances, and coercion.

I find the standard historical descriptor “unification” to be statist embellishing and give the false idea that this was somehow grassroots.

Lmao.

Sacks incompetent manager while being 17th and barely being able to play.

Hires fucking de Zerbi on a 5 year contract whilst in a relegation derby with 6 games to go

18th after first De Zerbi game

Levy 2026 Babyy!!

Y’all still doing this?

Depends who does the revolution aye

And noise

Make cars a choice again. Not a necessity!

And watch car ownership rates plummet. Turns out most people would gladly save their car money for something else if they could.

I would recommend reconsidering Wikipedia (ie. the Wikimedia foundation) since they have large reserves of money and their fundraising is misleading.

Wikipedia editors even sort of had a „revolt“ against the foundation because of the misleading fundraising banners.

Source

International Space Station

The only history I want is a revolution that makes things better. Is that too much to ask. 🥺👉👈

It‘s literally already so bad but no one connects the dots

Thinking about it this isn’t necessarily true in that moving the FOCAL relatively little could yield new things to observe (even microarcseconds). So you wouldn’t need a new FOCAL to measure each new thing. However each FOCAL would be measuring a miniscule bit of space over its lifetime. Which means for each distinct object that isn’t basically a neighbour in angular terms to a FOCAL sent you’d need a new FOCAL probably. Unless our long term energy generation/harvesting and propulsion in deep space significantly improves technology wise.